Interpreting the first amendment of the constitution essay

Third, once again, the General cites to sources that cannot be independently confirmed. The view expressed in these statements was widely reported and was apparently widely held. In addition, in a concurring opinion in Gonzales v.

That, in the light of the history of the twentieth century, those we rely on for serious constitutional and political commentary have failed to examine the issues of whether the state should have a monopoly of force and whether an armed population might still play an important role in deterring governmental excesses bespeaks a dangerous intellectual cowardice, a self-imposed limit on political and constitutional discourse that causes us largely to ignore one of the most critical questions of our time.

Originally published as 62 Tenn. But they have nothing to do directly with the purpose of maintaining an armed citizenry. As a practical matter, the limitation of Congress's ability to investigate only for a proper purpose "in aid of" its legislative powers functions as a limit on Congress's ability to investigate the private affairs of individual citizens; matters that simply demand action by another branch of government, without implicating an issue of public policy necessitating legislation by Congress, must be left to those branches due to the doctrine of separation of powers.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers;and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment. First, gun owners are no more "universal" than the National Guard--that is, although some people in every demographic category own guns, gun owners are disproportionately white, middle-class men, especially from the South.

The most prominent examples are those most relevant to the Second Amendment: One implication of this emphasis on the virtuous citizen is that the right to arms does not preclude laws disarming the unvirtuous i. First, it makes clear the division of responsibility with respect to the conduct of the election of federal Senators and Representatives.

Clarkson, Portraiture of Quakerism — 3d ed. And, of course, what the Stuarts had tried to do to their political enemies, George III had tried to do to the colonists. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law.

What Does Free Speech Mean?

Nor is Tennessee the only state whose constitution dates from the period of the Framing and contains such a provision. In either case, the Constitution has spoken, and that is enough.

When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. The Seventeenth Amendment altered the manner of conducting the elections of Senators; establishing that they are to be elected by the people of the states.

Outside that context the only carrying of firearms which the amendment appears to protect is such transportation as is implicit in the concept of a right to possess--e. Nor is it particularly consistent with either the language or the history of the Constitution.

Whitedestroy the grounding of the Union. A "well regulated militia" was thus one that was well-trained and equipped; not one that was "well-regulated" in the modern sense of being subjected to numerous government prohibitions and restrictions.

What Does Free Speech Mean?

However, if the complaint is that less-than-universal gun ownership renders the Second Amendment meaningless, then this answer does tend to present itself rather forcefully.

That may change, and if it does it will probably be a good thing. During the ratification debates, the fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through a standing army or select militia was pervasive in Antifederalist rhetoric. The right to self-defence is the first law of nature: And the United States has been a far more prosperous and contented country because of its federal system, though our system of federalism could stand to be bolstered.

The Supreme Court has interpreted the Qualifications Clause as an exclusive list of qualifications that cannot be supplemented by a House of Congress exercising its Section. Note, however, that under the original Constitution, the Governors of the states were expressly allowed by the Constitution to make temporary appointments.

In fact, in the case in which they have most recently demanded such a right, arguing religious ministers should be exempt from laws prohibiting employment discrimination, the Court majority did not embrace the theory, not even using the term once.

In all these ways, liberty is more robustly protected by confining lawmaking to the state and local levels in a federal system, than moving all such decisions to the national level.Interpreting laws and constitutions as living documents: The document's meaning is viewed as continually evolving to meet the culture's changing beliefs, practices, and knowledge.

The other day I came upon an essay written by an Advisory Board Member of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), retired Brigadier General John M. Compere.

I have read and responded to General Compere’s views before. In my view, the General espouses an overly expansive view of the. Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics. The following is a list of the classic books and other works on constitutional government, which we either include in our collection, or plan to add.

The other day I came upon an essay written by an Advisory Board Member of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), retired Brigadier General John M. Compere. I have read and responded to General Compere’s views before.

In my view, the General espouses an overly expansive view of the. Amendment I Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition Passed by Congress September 25, Ratified December 15, The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights.

Many aspects of the gun control issue are best measured and sometimes can only be measured through surveys, but the accuracy of such surveys depends upon respondents providing truthful answers to questions that are sometimes controversial and potentially incriminating.

Thus, Just Facts uses this data critically, citing the best-designed .

Download
Interpreting the first amendment of the constitution essay
Rated 3/5 based on 57 review